How was it determined so fast that these works were stolen? It seems a little fishy that Picasso's sone called a lawyer instead of the police. The lawyer wants the works to be stolen so he can bill someone for his time. Second, if the works were stolen, why would the person connected with the thief walk directly into Picasso's son's office presenting them to be authenticated. Strange to say the least.
Thinking about making a comment on this blog post? Great! But please remember that this space is for just that, comments about this blog post. It is not a place to post random thoughts about other stuff. We found that most of the "comments" posted here are not comments at all and should have really been posted in our forum. So:
If you are just planning to spam... go away as all the comments are premoderated
Have something to actually say about this blog post, please submit your comment here:
Leave a comment:
We welcome your comments on this post in the Art Works of Man Blog. That means a comment on this post, not something about some other topic.
Name: (required)
Email: (required, not published)
Comment:
Note: Your comment will be immediately submitted and you will have no opportunity to review to edit it.
It is recommend that you register on Art Works of Man Blog and login so you can include full html (ie: links). We don't have a chapta because we think we're smarter than the spambots.
20101201-220944-Stolen
* com * top 100 * 10 * 4102676020 * Blog * Espanol *
Have you added a link to us from your website? (4102676020):
<a href="http://www.artworksofman.com">Art Works of Man Blog</a>
